MachineOs

Sculptures imagined on computer in 3D, then cast or print in metal.

I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms.
Machine_os I
I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms.
Machine_os II
I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms.
Machine_os IV
I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms.
Machine_os V
I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms.
Machine_os VI
I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms.
Machine_os IX
I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms. I come from the bronze age, having been a foundryman for 15 years. Then I became interested in virtual space. That’s what I experienced. This passage from one to the other. Today, I would say from one from the other. With the MachineOs series, I sought to interrogate this new tool by bringing into dialogue the modeling concepts at work in my software. A bit like a blowtorch talking to a hammer. MachineOs are thus the result of a dialogue between polygonal modeling and NURBS. One is more geared to mechanical, angular shapes, the other to organic, supple forms.

●○● Hello ! I have chosen not to use cookies on my site. However, I had to authorize Google to access analysis information so that my sculptures could be visible on the net. But only if you decide to.

For more information I have detailed my my privacy policy here

  1. home
  2. > Sculpture
  3. > MachineOs